Reentry Legal Clinic
  • home
  • training
  • calendar
  • about us
  • other clinics

Reentry Legal Clinic in Long Beach 

5/23/2012

0 Comments

 
A New Way of Life Reentry Project--the host community-based organization for Reentry Legal Clinic--opened a new office in Long Beach recently, in partnership with Long Beach City Councilmember Dee Andrews.  As part of that collaboration, we are also starting a clinic down in Long Beach.  It will be hosted by Central C.H.A., Inc. in their Center for Working Families.  The first clinic is scheduled for September 15, 2012.  A follow-up clinic will be held 2 months later, on November 17, 2012.  This is a "pilot" project for the time being.  Depending on the turnout, we may make it (1) permanent and (2) monthly.  Stay tuned.
0 Comments

arrest not leading to a conviction

5/23/2012

0 Comments

 
This morning's hearing was in Dep't S in Norwalk, before Hon. Roger Ito, for a discretionary 1203.4 that had been previously denied about 6 months ago.  The client had a number of convictions, but the conviction to dismiss today was for possession for sale, a felony, in 2007.  While on probation for this conviction, she picked up 2 new cases, one of which resulted in a successful Prop-36 dismissal and the other, an  arrest dismissed by the prosecutor--both in 2010.

As a rule, when writing declarations for our clients, we do not address any arrest that did not result in a conviction, because, without the conviction, it is not conclusive evidence of the underlying conduct.  However, Judge Ito rightly chastised my client (well, actually, me) for not addressing in her declaration the circumstance surrounding the 2010 arrest.  As he pointed out, "in the interest of justice" analysis requires consideration of all facts before the court, and the dismissed arrest is a relevant fact for the purpose of such analysis.

From experience, I suspect that most judges have already made up their mind one way or the other before they hold a hearing.  However, there are those few judges who really look at the evidence before them before issuing their ruling.  It is for these few judges that we write a declaration and, if possible, submit evidence of rehabilitation.  It's not right to deprive them of the full facts that may be of relevance to their decision-making--especially given that the opposing side may well bring its absence up as indirect evidence of the petitioner's lack of honesty.

The lesson has a happy ending.  After a lengthy back-and-forth, the court granted the petition in the interest of justice, finding that the petitioner's interest in rehabilitation, coupled with the solid evidence of the record's hindrance therein (a letter of employment denial based solely on this one conviction), warranted dismissal.
0 Comments

    Archives

    June 2014
    May 2014
    March 2014
    November 2013
    September 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    May 2012
    April 2012
    January 2012
    July 2011
    June 2011

    Categories

    All
    All Of Us Or None
    Capacity
    History
    Lessons
    Referrals

    RSS Feed


Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.